Quality Indicators for Colonoscopy
ACG: American College of Gastroenterology; ADR: adenoma detection rate; APC: adenoma per colonoscopy; ASGE: American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy; CRC: colorectal cancer; PDR: polyp detection rate Colonoscopy is widely used for the diagnosis and treatment of colon disorders. Properly performed, colonoscopy is generally safe, accurate, and well-tolerated. Visualization of the mucosa of the entire large intestine and distal terminal ileum usually is possible during colonoscopy. Polyps can be removed during colonoscopy, thereby reducing the risk of colon cancer. Colonoscopy is the preferred method to evaluate the colon in most adult patients with large-bowel symptoms, iron deficiency anemia, abnormal results on radiographic studies of the colon, positive results on colorectal cancer (CRC) screening tests, post-polypectomy and post-cancer resection surveillance, and diagnosis and surveillance in inflammatory bowel disease. In addition, colonoscopy is the most commonly used CRC screening test in the United States (1). Based on 2010 data, over 3.3 million outpatient colonoscopies are performed annually in the United States, with screening and polyp surveillance accounting for half of indications (2). Optimal effectiveness of colonoscopy depends on patient acceptance of the procedure, which depends mostly on acceptance of the bowel preparation (3). Preparation quality affects the completeness of examination, procedure duration, and the need to cancel or repeat procedures at earlier dates than would otherwise be needed (4, 5). Ineffective preparation is a major contributor to costs (6). Meticulous inspection (7, 8) and longer withdrawal times (9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14) are associated with higher adenoma detection rates (ADR). A high ADR is essential to rendering recommended intervals (15) between screening and surveillance examinations safe (16, 17). Optimal technique is needed to ensure a high probability of detecting dysplasia when present in inflammatory bowel disease (17, 18, 19, 20, 21). Finally, technical expertise and experience will help prevent adverse events that might offset the benefits of removing neoplastic lesions (22). Recent studies report that colonoscopy is less effective in preventing proximal colon cancer and cancer deaths (ie, colon cancer proximal to the splenic flexure) compared with distal cancer (ie, colon cancer at or distal to the splenic flexure) (23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28). Decreased protection against right-sided CRC is likely due to multiple factors. These include missed adenomas or incompletely resected adenomas; suboptimal bowel preparation; precancerous lesions that are endoscopically subtle or difficult to remove, such as sessile serrated polyps and flat and/or depressed adenomas, and differences in tumorigenesis between right-sided and left-sided cancers. Improving prevention of right-sided colon cancer is a major goal of colonoscopy quality programs. Five studies have established that gastroenterologists are more effective than surgeons or primary care physicians at preventing CRC by colonoscopy (27, 29, 30, 31, 32). This most likely reflects higher rates of complete examinations (ie, cecal intubation) (30) and higher rates of adenoma detection among gastroenterologists (33, 34). All endoscopists performing colonoscopy should measure the quality of their colonoscopy. Institutions where endoscopists from multiple specialties are practicing should reasonably expect all endoscopists to participate in the program and achieve recommended quality benchmarks. The quality of health care can be measured by comparing the performance of an individual or a group of individuals with an ideal or benchmark (35). The particular parameter that is being used for comparison is termed a quality indicator. A quality indicator often is reported as a ratio between the incidence of correct performance and the opportunity for correct performance (4) or as the proportion of interventions that achieve a goal (35). can be of the entire health care by a or in that quality performance during the of care ADR and during colonoscopy for the results of the care that the prevention of cancer by colonoscopy and in the incidence of In the American Society for Gastrointestinal College of on in their of quality for colonoscopy The present to quality and quality for performing colonoscopy that associated with in and and in studies studies a of by of the of all such studies by of a is that of would their a of quality is is a might be widely used for quality or quality in the on to the quality of care to patients is by to the in which is performed, of quality in the of The quality on the of the quality indicator as an or a quality are can be difficult to measure in need of large of and and be by factors. In such the to as of The of a indicator on the that with a and such of quality for in a that to be as quality and a of performance for quality indicator. The performance from in the when to a performance when to a quality indicator a such as during the performance as is to that the performance the of care as to quality and In to quality the recommended a of the on their and that performance in and of of the of procedures needed to an with intervals and the of A for an individual is to measure their with to would to quality the endoscopists are performing recommended or the or and performance of that quality are to all such are in in a to the in The and to all are in will be in as the to be to to of quality to all procedures quality The all between of the and the patient the of or of the for all procedures during risk of a of and and of the procedure quality to performance of colonoscopy include the with which colonoscopy is performed for an that is in a of and the is of of The indications for colonoscopy should be for procedure, and when is a should be in the performing colonoscopy for CRC screening or colon polyp surveillance, endoscopists should the patient a colonoscopy of the colonoscopy that the of that procedure is and from polyps removed during that indications for colonoscopy In the indications for procedures This by a of and have that when colonoscopy is for more are In which indications and and at to as is likely that can be to a rate The on the of Gastrointestinal is a for the of colonoscopy The goal is to the of procedures with which is of associated with colonoscopy, and of of In to the associated with all the should the and adverse events to colonoscopy with all be the procedure from the patient or as by or per of the include a of the and to the The most of colonoscopy include adverse missed and adverse with which colonoscopies recommended post-polypectomy and post-cancer resection surveillance intervals and intervals between screening colonoscopies in patients have results and bowel of of colonoscopy to be effective and and to the intervals between examinations should be between examinations can be effective in prevention of CRC when the colon is of and effective of the colon, as in the is to the effectiveness and of recommended intervals between colonoscopy. The recommended intervals cecal bowel and In the risk for CRC or have with CRC and that cancer at screening is recommended in all and at intervals A that a screening colonoscopy associated with of protection against colorectal cancer In of an colonoscopy with a a repeat colonoscopy a studies of a of with and and longer of protection colonoscopy is is These the American screening colonoscopy at intervals in individuals This is patients to and be performing colonoscopy for CRC endoscopists should for the patient a colonoscopy, of the colonoscopy, and from polyps removed during that colonoscopy that is This should that colonoscopy for CRC screening or colon polyp surveillance is being performed at an from that post-polypectomy surveillance colonoscopy in the United States is performed at intervals that are than recommended in that of is and of is to for of colonoscopy. of of surveillance in patients and in patients of colonoscopy of colonoscopy for screening and post-polypectomy surveillance by physicians These the of intervals between examinations in quality programs. more likely to intervals than gastroenterologists the need for all specialties practicing colonoscopy to participate in quality programs. care and physicians can reasonably expect surveillance to post-polypectomy surveillance or to be by an the recommended from the between examinations are recommended on the and experience that a between the of colonoscopy with the and of colonoscopy. are by the and of precancerous lesions with sessile polyps in that are removed have a high risk for polyp at the and at to (15) and a a to a of polyp at the post-polypectomy surveillance intervals for sessile serrated polyps sessile serrated and serrated adenomas are on and will be to as lesions include sessile serrated and serrated the sessile serrated are the of a group of that in the proximal post-polypectomy surveillance intervals for sessile serrated polyps are to recommended intervals for adenomas and are on and of lesions lesions of all should be to patients the for serrated as for which colonoscopy is recommended at to intervals have colon a colonoscopy repeat examinations at intervals than the of by for the a colonoscopy is the positive of during that is of for in as an to colonoscopy is performed for screening or surveillance at intervals than recommended in and an for the should be to have an with which and surveillance is recommended intervals of of In and surveillance to examinations in patients with disease have an in which dysplasia The is used when patients are are colonoscopy on the of disease. to examinations or examinations in patients to and of are associated with an risk of colorectal cancer colonoscopy often is recommended to the of when the or in disease when more than of the colon is are to the effectiveness of surveillance colonoscopy in or studies in a for patients participate in surveillance of in the United States and the United that are with surveillance have a of and in to of dysplasia should surveillance colonoscopy, which as a of care in the United The of disease is to be the of for the of surveillance for and the of dysplasia or cancer during surveillance is and is to of surveillance colonoscopy during the between and of intervals of to are generally the of primary and a colon that is studies to that the risk for CRC in in intervals between examinations are for patients with disease and be earlier in the of disease in patients with established risk such as a of CRC or a of primary with primary are to have should surveillance at the is with endoscopically abnormal or are at risk for of compared with patients with endoscopically patients with endoscopically or with can be to longer intervals of surveillance of at to at during the from to the of symptoms, and the of primary physicians to recommended for screening and surveillance missed of interventions will to serrated lesions in the proximal colon are are intervals for of sessile serrated polyps and large the incidence of splenic during colonoscopy in the is the among of surveillance for and will with recommended surveillance and should surveillance be for endoscopists with the of adenomas surveillance for endoscopists with high quality of the colon of of the entire colon and a and costs by the need for radiographic procedures or repeat colonoscopy to complete the inspection is essential to effective CRC prevention and of cancer The detection of neoplastic lesions is the primary goal of most of colonoscopy for the detection of neoplastic lesions are rates per of adverse repeat and for endoscopically polyps can is on endoscopists to evaluate their and possible to the costs associated with The from the of or of the when is to the of the This all the technical of the procedure of the and of to most procedures is the of and need for patient quality to performance of colonoscopy include the with which the procedure the quality of preparation of of of bowel preparation is on to the mucosa and have The should the quality of the bowel preparation in colonoscopy commonly used to bowel preparation include and In have are in of bowel preparation often which is of to the can be the or The that the be detection of the technical of the polyps in is to preparation such as the Preparation or the Preparation the that can be removed of the endoscopists should the quality of bowel preparation on to polyps or bowel is to polyps in and the procedure is being performed for CRC screening or colon polyp surveillance, the procedure should be in or less preparation the that the recommended the colonoscopy will be with bowel preparation is a major to the effectiveness of colonoscopy. preparation cecal and withdrawal and detection of (4) and large (4, In colonoscopies be at intervals than recommended on The of examinations of bowel preparation is (6). with which the bowel preparation is to the of recommended surveillance or screening intervals of of outpatient examinations of that the of outpatient examinations with bowel preparation that repeat colonoscopy in should of an individual of examinations of preparation is have of examinations with bowel preparation should their bowel preparation patient of and for the of the Recent of have effectiveness than that rates of preparation are in by preparation and in patient the colonoscopy to achieve of The most of preparation quality is the between the of the preparation and the of the procedure as the and the of the colon is that all patients be of bowel that half the preparation is on the of the the entire preparation can be on the of to of the American Society of patients should have by for of that be for for and This is by studies that that of in the is and patients the bowel preparation or all of the bowel preparation on the the procedure patients with longer intervals be in with such as or risk of of with that might be more to or in with or disease in a might be should to the half of to their procedure and should be with by at that the quality of preparation as the patients in the to to the can of the half of the preparation on the and preparation is with which of the by of and of is in procedure of cecal rate with cecal rate with of In the United States, colonoscopy is with the to the is as of the to a proximal to the that the entire cecal the of the between the and is The need for cecal is on the that a of colorectal are in the proximal colon, the cecal rates have associated with higher rates of proximal colon cancer of cecal are should be by the cecal include the and the in which is as to the of the of the (ie, the or of the terminal ileum will be can cecal in in of their is of the with can be to such as the cecal or of the terminal of the is of the be in all of in cecal the be or have a is in a of and of cecal rates of individual endoscopists in the quality The of the to are of the from a that the cecal is the and a of the from distal to the of the terminal ileum are and are less likely to be effective compared with the of the is in at the of the is in and of the can be a effective of cecal for an rates of cecal should be to the in of all and of when the is screening in a Colonoscopy studies in screening patients in the United States, and at times from the United States, have reported cecal rates of or higher in which procedures are of preparation or need be in cecal that is to the to the is to in which the of the procedure is treatment of a or or a large polyp in the colon distal to the that complete colon by method performed All in which a or is should be with which adenomas are in individuals of ADR for for of of of detection by to adenomas in colonoscopy studies and in studies that used Colonoscopy to prevent all CRC in colonoscopy for to the procedure (23, 24, 25, 26, 27, with most of the to missed lesions and from as as in and rates is of in the detection of adenomas by This the for the of for adenoma in and by the in The measure for detection the of patients screening colonoscopy or more adenomas as the adenoma detection rate or ADR The recommended for ADR on screening colonoscopy studies and at the detection rates of adenomas in studies the that individual should or more adenomas in at of and of screening colonoscopy The to the of adenomas and the of adenomas by studies and during and a that the to to prevent cancer are endoscopists with In a of screening colonoscopy for the that patients colonoscopy by physicians with for of times higher than patients of physicians with to that cancer protection to when that physicians with high rates patients from right-sided cancer than physicians with rates Recent studies report that are higher than the and in that individual These that the ADR for a might have that the results in cancer prevention or detection of lesions the of ADR in patients colonoscopies by from their examinations for or colonoscopy with the health care or with The of the gastroenterologists from to and in for The patients cancers. The for cancer in the ADR from to and per of of physicians in the ADR an risk of cancer of compared with patients of physicians in the ADR a in CRC incidence and a in cancer for in associated with a risk of proximal and distal cancer and risk in and Based on the a for ADR in a screening of at endoscopists colonoscopy for or patients endoscopists in or endoscopists with patient an ADR of is recommended for and for Colonoscopy to individual for and patients in from a of screening patients that are at the of performance in are by endoscopists in All should have their and with to of ADR performance needed to CRC should be a of should be used as performance in the quality The that adenoma are and are for in the recommended should be measured in patients and are for and on adenoma include and of the ADR for of is ADR is the primary measure of the quality of inspection and the most quality measure in colonoscopy. is a between ADR and recommended intervals for screening and surveillance, that patient be of an ADR and to recommended with high and patients at intervals the recommended intervals are when precancerous lesions are with to patients with precancerous lesions and patients with multiple patients at risk for cancer by to the colon and intervals between This the essential of the ADR of individual to ensure patient protection ADR is the measure of the quality of inspection with to of of and to of the detection of precancerous lesions and ADR of in most which for the or A is that a and to polyp with the of an the the mucosa as In and results from that for of the of to ADR have and The polyp detection rate is the of patients with polyp removed during screening colonoscopy in patients the of of and with ADR in studies rates for to ADR have A a between rates and cancer protection an to ADR when used in quality be to in that of the of colorectal polyps to have a risk of cancer (ie, distal colon can be measured by by or the performing colonoscopy. the of of studies of are and to studies are performed, is as a quality indicator to be used of A measure that is the adenoma per colonoscopy which is commonly used in of detection reflects inspection over the entire of the colon than ADR and between endoscopists might to costs or to polyp in a to be by of to detection of multiple the of and is to be the most to and is recommended to and to ensure that to In the ADR be on of adenoma for adenomas of adenoma for right-sided left-sided or polyp The of for serrated lesions particular for ADR established by studies detection of adenomas and to serrated lesions the is a sessile serrated is an of lesions have These lesions are in a from adenomas and should be the Recent that is more between of the group in detection of lesions than is for adenomas that polyps is a for lesions than is for for the that missed serrated lesions are is the that are more likely to be and in the proximal colon should be a detection for serrated lesions is the of with a of for all serrated lesions sessile serrated in the proximal colon A be needed ADR and proximal colon serrated detection are the would need to be for proximal serrated lesions distal colon lesions is A proximal colon would be to with and of The would be sessile serrated the between sessile serrated polyp and polyp is to in sessile serrated polyps as a detection Finally, ADR and have to with colon cancer for to of the quality of inspection have to for an to polyp and and that endoscopists would the of polyps on by and and of the lesions to for a would as the of the polyp and the of The goal of most colonoscopies is the detection and prevention of ADR is an measure of the that with CRC and effective prevention of CRC (16, 30, This is with higher are more likely to be when patients as In addition, adenoma detection and resection prevent CRC and CRC CRC prevention is an ideal and effective polyp detection or resection are established as the by which colonoscopy ADR is an with which withdrawal is measured of of withdrawal in screening colonoscopies of of should be measured in all colonoscopy with the performance being a withdrawal in screening have detection of neoplastic lesions in examinations in which the withdrawal is that withdrawal should be in colonoscopies performed for CRC screening in patients with withdrawal is to ADR as a quality withdrawal times to with be essential or The primary of withdrawal be in performance of with which are of in associated with an between longer withdrawal and higher detection rates (7, 10, 11, 12, 13, of the colon which is studies an between and from withdrawal and technique is likely to be by withdrawal that the withdrawal of colonoscopy in patients and in or are performed, should on of the that the of to an individual is in and in a colon of and can be in This is should be that where the to a cancer and performance of colonoscopy. with which are when colonoscopy is performed for an of of of with and have mucosa at colonoscopy. The diagnosis of otherwise All patients colonoscopy for the of should have The and of is are of from the proximal colon the for (17, of recommended when colonoscopy is performed for surveillance in and of of of with or per of colon in of of the colon and terminal ileum can in the of and disease and in from disease. Recent have established that with results in and of dysplasia 20, 21). a can be used The recommended in from of the colon, which results in to The procedure report in surveillance examinations should the and of from flat mucosa and the and of or lesions that for or with which of polyps and sessile polyps is of of polyps and sessile polyps in should be for resection an at resection or of should be to and of colorectal polyps during colonoscopy for repeat colonoscopy and by is the of difficult polyps to more endoscopists for resection is In polyps in have for resection such are endoscopically in by of sessile polyps in for resection is In polyps be difficult to or for and to more be should of polyps their or and should in such polyps to endoscopists for a of or sessile polyps in are on their the colon, their and the to endoscopically resection is more effective and than resection to is for resection of a large sessile the should resection of of the polyp such a resection will in a that can the at resection more all polyps can be removed All polyps for resection should be to the need for resection in the quality of by a more can be to ensure the of is of and and of polyp should be to the of and lesions for resection that are in an that can be with by the and proximal colon where the is endoscopically and the should be with of in to to ensure resection of the correct the be during colonoscopy is needed to the correct is the most for bowel preparation can patient and and of and of bowel are associated with an risk of an bowel and interventions can such ADR when used resection of distal colon polyps or ADR as of a quality in CRC when of cecal is a and measure of the quality of ADR and proximal serrated lesions a detection for proximal colon serrated lesions and to surveillance be when colonoscopy is performed by endoscopists with high would patients in with or more adenomas, all of which are adenomas, colonoscopy in detection of lesions to as the ADR screening that or to patients for colonoscopy, can ADR be used as a quality and at technical or adenoma by with is the of the withdrawal by colonoscopy (ie, at detection of over colonoscopy in is the of to recommended or of for inflammatory bowel disease in often are patients with polyps than are large colon polyps in and among in specialties gastroenterologists is the rate of resection of large sessile polyps in completeness of resection of serrated will the need to ADR for quality the of for the of quality The from the the is removed to include to the of the procedure, and of adverse with and patient quality to performance of colonoscopy include the of by procedure indications CRC and post-polypectomy of of of of post-polypectomy of rates be on of with or of with is generally the most adverse in the during or colonoscopy. of are rates of widely and studies on have reported in the A of patients reported an risk of of in risk of less than in screening patients rates in screening patients are the patients are generally and to have associated colon that have associated with colorectal more of and all of the data, rates in or in in screening patients should by an or to or are that in as as that prevent are or the The should to against and in the should be removed as as of a more or per when is colon, or otherwise of in resection of polyps and in of resection safe likely risk during A an to an can prevent the from the and the colon should be used in In with inspection of can help the of of than the risk of in patients with or with that are during the procedure be by the of or by large that are over the of the for rates can be difficult to over in with procedure is to have the of all and by the or by an This can to in and in that patient risk in is the most adverse of can be the or In the of or is associated with an risk of is associated with a risk of In the of or are and the of for is that the risk of post-polypectomy should be rates that should by from or the are In the risk of with polyp proximal colon and of such as polyps in in the proximal colon, rates that help include for sessile or polyps and for polyps resection have associated with from polyps and of reducing from large sessile and flat lesions as the risk be to the of and/or to and the risk when lesions are resected is with which post-polypectomy is of of In repeat colon and treatment of results in In of post-polypectomy can be post-polypectomy can generally be by and should from the of a polyp can be by the and for or This in the can be by of or by of by of is an adverse results in or for include large polyp proximal colon and the of for be the patient or from the colonoscopy in patients have is and should be performed at the of the present with and are to usually are an repeat colonoscopy, which be performed bowel preparation is can be by of or in with