Valid post-selection inference

It is common practice in statistical data analysis to perform data-driven variable selection and derive statistical inference from the resulting model. Such inference enjoys none of the guarantees that classical statistical theory provides for tests and confidence intervals when the model has been chosen a priori. We propose to produce valid “post-selection inference” by reducing the problem to one of simultaneous inference and hence suitably widening conventional confidence and retention intervals. Simultaneity is required for all linear functions that arise as coefficient estimates in all submodels. By purchasing “simultaneity insurance” for all possible submodels, the resulting post-selection inference is rendered universally valid under all possible model selection procedures. This inference is therefore generally conservative for particular selection procedures, but it is always less conservative than full Scheffé protection. Importantly it does not depend on the truth of the selected submodel, and hence it produces valid inference even in wrong models. We describe the structure of the simultaneous inference problem and give some asymptotic results.

Estimating causaleffects of treatments i…Estimating causal effects of treatments in randomized and nonrandomized studies.A note on data-splittingfor the evaluation of…A note on data-splitting for the evaluation of significance levelsFrom Association toCausation in…From Association to Causation in Observational Studies: The Role of Tests of Strongly Ignorable Treatment AssignmentEffects of ModelSelection on InferenceEffects of Model Selection on InferenceFrequentist ModelAverage EstimatorsFrequentist Model Average EstimatorsMODEL SELECTION ANDINFERENCE: FACTS AND…MODEL SELECTION AND INFERENCE: FACTS AND FICTIONIdentification andInference in Nonlinear…Identification and Inference in Nonlinear Difference-in-Differences ModelsMostly HarmlessEconometricsMostly Harmless EconometricsAlternatives to theRandomized Controlled…Alternatives to the Randomized Controlled TrialStatistical InferenceAfter Model SelectionStatistical Inference After Model SelectionMatching Methods forCausal Inference: A…Matching Methods for Causal Inference: A Review and a Look ForwardSynthetic ControlMethods for Comparative…Synthetic Control Methods for Comparative Case Studies: Estimating the Effect of California’s Tobacco Control ProgramOptimal Inference AfterModel SelectionOptimal Inference After Model SelectionOn asymptoticallyoptimal confidence…On asymptotically optimal confidence regions and tests for high-dimensional modelsHigh-DimensionalInference: Confidence…High-Dimensional Inference: Confidence Intervals, p-Values and R-Software hdiExact Post-SelectionInference for Sequentia…Exact Post-Selection Inference for Sequential Regression ProceduresEstimation and Inferenceof Heterogeneous…Estimation and Inference of Heterogeneous Treatment Effects using Random ForestsAsymptoticpost-selection inferenc…Asymptotic post-selection inference for the Akaike information criterionPanning for Gold:‘Model-X’ Knockoffs for…Panning for Gold: ‘Model-X’ Knockoffs for High Dimensional Controlled Variable SelectionBootstrapping and samplesplitting for…Bootstrapping and sample splitting for high-dimensional, assumption-lean inferencePostselection Inferencein Structural Equation…Postselection Inference in Structural Equation ModelingPost-Selection InferencePost-Selection InferenceApproximate SelectiveInference via Maximum…Approximate Selective Inference via Maximum LikelihoodIs Seeing Believing? APractitioner's…Is Seeing Believing? A Practitioner's Perspective on High-Dimensional Statistical Inference in Cancer Genomics StudiesValid post-selectioninferenceValid post-selection inference過去の参考文献中心の論文この論文を引用する論文古い新しい

ノードをクリックするとフォーカスを固定、空白をクリックすると本論文に戻ります。ホバーで一時的にプレビューできます。各ノードのページはタイトルから開けます。